PS3 Informer

The GameFlavor Network

 

Sony's Jack Tretton Sticks to the Ten Year Plan

The ten-year plan is to Jack Tretton what tear gas is to the Iranian Government, or what heterosexual marriage is to Sarah Palin. In other words, it's an ideology, an organizing principle. The president of Sony Computer Entertainment has faced many challenges to his bold strategy, with some of the harshest criticisms coming just this past week. First, Activision CEO Bobby Kotick came out publicly and stated that his company would stop making games for the Playstation 3 if Sony did not cut prices and sell more hardware. Then, in slightly more polite (and characteristically Japanese) terms, Koei president Kenji Matsubara asked if Sony would "please lower the price" of the PS3. It's almost like Tretton came home from a night of debauchery to find himself in the middle of an intervention.

However, rather than recognizing that he's got a problem, the Sony president appears more convinced than ever by his ten-year timeline for success of the Playstation 3. Among other things, that means that we can't expect a significant price cut very soon. Talking recently to Fast Company magazine, he blasted cheaper consoles from competitors while re-iterating his allegiance to, you guessed it, a ten-year plan:


"[P]eople are always wanting you to lower your price on hardware. We could've come out with a PlayStation 2.5 for $299 or less, and in the first two or three years it would sell extremely well. But there would be a point where people would be going, "I am not really seeing the incremental leap." We feel that we're sacrificing the short term to pay dividends in the long term. People are having short-term thinking--the platform is not even three years old. It was $599; it's now $399. The focus on pricing is something we appreciate, but you have to have the conviction and the confidence that you are on the right path for the long term and ultimately you'll get all the consumers you want. You won't get them all day one, but we're looking to get them over a 10-year period."



jacktretton_ps3.jpg

Sony Computer Entertainment President Jack Tretton holds up a Playstation 3 at a promotional event.


On one hand, a ten-year vision for hardware does have a certain appeal. It suggestive of traditional corporate values like customer loyalty and trust. We know that Sony won't come out with a better, faster PS3 just days after we finally plunk down the money for one, and that it will continue to support our console long after competitors have withered. On the other hand, the incredible speed at which technology improves means that locking in to a ten-year cycle seems stifling. Apple doesn't wait for more than a few months before updating its many product lines, and it seems to be doing quite well. What would happen if Microsoft released a brand new Xbox console in 2011 that quadrupled the processor speed, ram and storage of current models? The current model of PS3, by contrast, isn't set to expire until 2016. Would Sony continue to flog its PS3 platform for five more years?








Stumble It!

Comments

Tzaylor

 - July 5, 2009 9:55 PM

Jack Tretton is right. Everyone who wants a price cut just wants to sell more of their own software. Which is reasonable, but the thing we have to remember is that Sony has to make money too. I want sony to make as much money as possible because they have the best product, I want them to stay in business. I paid 400 for my ps3 and don't regret it one bit. With blu ray, free online, built in wireless you can't go wrong. Trust what they are doing, support them by buying their games!

SLIM

 - July 6, 2009 8:43 AM

@ Tzaylor:
Come on now...stop trying to justify the poor marketing and lineup of games for this system. Now, before you think I’m a fanboy, understand this...I waited in line to receive my PS3 on release date. And since that date, I’ve only purchased 5 games for it! Why?...well first of all, the basic hardcore gaming functions we were promised has never come. I STILL CANNOT PLAY MUSIC while playing games. Sony has dragged their feet and by saying this system has a ten year cycle only proves that they are in denial and know they will not be superior or equal to the 360 until 2016. Yes the 360's RRoD are frustrating but I’ve purchased more games and had more fun on my 360 than my PS3. They just don’t compare. Do yourself a favor and get a 360 too….

…and the HOME service sucks, sorry! I don’t see how that is fun….a bunch of avatar dudes walking around….that’s Gay!!!!

If they want to compete, cut prices and get into the lab and try to make this "superior system" better….It’s currently losing on every aspect, except Blu-Ray and free PSN access. I own a desktop and laptop so internet is not what I use it for. But if you divide the cost of an Xbox Live subscription by 12 months…it equates to the price of a McDonalds combo meal….is that really expensive for a excellent service? I DIDN’T THINK SO!!! PS3 sucks and I will not say it’s GREAT just because I own one…

cool mins

 - July 29, 2009 4:00 PM

im an owner of xbox360 and ps3 i think both systems rule insanly i also agree with the 10-year plan too

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them. Thanks for waiting.)

Join the GameFlavor Forums

Tasty Talk. Join the conversation on the GameFlavor Forums!

Subscribe

-->
 
GameFlavor: Delicously good video games coverage

Copyright © GameFlavor 2005-2009. All rights reserved - Privacy. Don’t steal our stuff!