PS3 Informer

PS3 Slim Coming Soon!

Update: the rumors turned out to be true! You can read the full scoop with details about the PS3 Slim here.\n\nHoly chunk-oly PS3! We think it's time you lose some of those curves and \"slim\" down! Sure, your voluptuous body has sex appeal, but it pales in comparison to that white, hourglass-figure, skinny old XBOX 360. PS3, your previous generations began oversized like Kristie Alley in \"Fat Actress\", but eventually they lost their size and were released in a sleeker design.\n\nIn 1994, the PS1 was introduced to the gaming community. In Y2K (year 2000), the PS1 received a surprisingly slender and complete redesign considering the same year it's successor was released, the PS2. in time, the PS2 shed its size like the first model and was redesigned in 2004 while maintaining its rectangle appeal. The latter years of 2004, trickling into 2005 the PSP was introduced! The following year (2006 incase you lost track) the powerful, most popular Blu-Ray player PS3 was released. Two years from this point, the PSP received the Jenny Craig treatment with a slimmer redesign, not to mention colorful choices. Eat your heart out Nintendo DS!\n\n\nImage credit: T3\n\nTo help the PS3 lose some of its size, the PS3 could ditch the media card slot option. Who actually uses these media readers? Let us know in the boards. Also, if the PS3 sacrificed its curvy figure it may present the optical illusion of a thinner model. So when will the PS3 stop fooling itself that Richard Simons actually works, hop onto the manufacturing line, and reintroduce itself as an Extreme Makeover participant in a slimmer, even sexier design?\n\nSoon! The time is coming, the PS3 will receive a slimline makeover like it's predecessors. History reveals Sony's PlayStation franchise releases each platform in two version. The first version is the \"fat\" version while the second is a sleeker, slimmer build. This data also shows each redesign is released relative to its successor. So what's your vision for the PS3 Slim? What do you think it would look like? Actually, nevermind. It looks a little something like this:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n